Showing 1–250 of 307 rated games.
| ID | Date | Tournament | Phase | Player A | A | B | Player B | GD | Sum | TS | Rating A | Rating B | Elo Diff | Fav ES | Adjustment | Adjustment lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 307 | Feb 23 2002 |  London II |
League | Mark E |
0 | 8 | James L |
8 | 8 | 8 | 1536 | 1601 | 65 | 59.2% | James L +13.1 | Mark E -13.1 |
| 306 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Simon B |
4 | 4 | Nazim C |
0 | 8 | 4 | 1645 | 1673 | 28 | 54.0% | Simon B +1.3 | Nazim C -1.3 |
| 305 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Nazim C |
6 | 2 | Bill V |
4 | 8 | 6 | 1673 | 1597 | 76 | 60.8% | Nazim C +12.6 | Bill V -12.6 |
| 304 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Rikki F |
8 | 4 | Robert S |
4 | 12 | 8 | 1661 | 1627 | 34 | 54.9% | Rikki F +14.4 | Robert S -14.4 |
| 303 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Bill V |
6 | 6 | Rikki F |
0 | 12 | 6 | 1597 | 1661 | 64 | 59.2% | Bill V +2.9 | Rikki F -2.9 |
| 302 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | James L |
8 | 0 | Mark E |
8 | 8 | 8 | 1601 | 1536 | 65 | 59.2% | James L +13.1 | Mark E -13.1 |
| 301 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Rikki F |
2 | 2 | James L |
0 | 4 | 2 | 1661 | 1601 | 60 | 58.6% | James L +2.8 | Rikki F -2.8 |
| 300 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Bill V |
5 | 6 | Simon B |
1 | 11 | 6 | 1597 | 1645 | 48 | 56.9% | Simon B +13.8 | Bill V -13.8 |
| 299 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Mark E |
0 | 6 | Nazim C |
6 | 6 | 6 | 1536 | 1673 | 137 | 68.7% | Nazim C +10.0 | Mark E -10.0 |
| 298 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Robert S |
2 | 1 | Bill V |
1 | 3 | 2 | 1627 | 1597 | 30 | 54.3% | Robert S +14.6 | Bill V -14.6 |
| 297 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Nazim C |
7 | 1 | Robert S |
6 | 8 | 7 | 1673 | 1627 | 46 | 56.5% | Nazim C +13.9 | Robert S -13.9 |
| 296 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | James L |
4 | 4 | Rikki F |
0 | 8 | 4 | 1601 | 1661 | 60 | 58.6% | James L +2.8 | Rikki F -2.8 |
| 295 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Simon B |
8 | 0 | Mark E |
8 | 8 | 8 | 1645 | 1536 | 109 | 65.2% | Simon B +11.1 | Mark E -11.1 |
| 294 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Bill V |
4 | 3 | Nazim C |
1 | 7 | 4 | 1597 | 1673 | 76 | 60.8% | Bill V +19.4 | Nazim C -19.4 |
| 293 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Robert S |
4 | 2 | James L |
2 | 6 | 4 | 1627 | 1601 | 26 | 53.8% | Robert S +14.8 | James L -14.8 |
| 292 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Rikki F |
7 | 2 | Mark E |
5 | 9 | 7 | 1661 | 1536 | 125 | 67.3% | Rikki F +10.5 | Mark E -10.5 |
| 291 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | James L |
2 | 3 | Simon B |
1 | 5 | 3 | 1601 | 1645 | 44 | 56.4% | Simon B +14.0 | James L -14.0 |
| 290 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Mark E |
3 | 5 | Bill V |
2 | 8 | 5 | 1536 | 1597 | 61 | 58.7% | Bill V +13.2 | Mark E -13.2 |
| 289 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Simon B |
0 | 3 | Robert S |
3 | 3 | 3 | 1645 | 1627 | 18 | 52.6% | Robert S +16.8 | Simon B -16.8 |
| 288 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Nazim C |
2 | 3 | James L |
1 | 5 | 3 | 1673 | 1601 | 72 | 60.2% | James L +19.3 | Nazim C -19.3 |
| 287 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | James L |
2 | 3 | Bill V |
1 | 5 | 3 | 1601 | 1597 | 4 | 50.6% | Bill V +16.2 | James L -16.2 |
| 286 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Robert S |
1 | 2 | Simon B |
1 | 3 | 2 | 1627 | 1645 | 18 | 52.6% | Simon B +15.2 | Robert S -15.2 |
| 285 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Bill V |
6 | 2 | Mark E |
4 | 8 | 6 | 1597 | 1536 | 61 | 58.7% | Bill V +13.2 | Mark E -13.2 |
| 284 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Simon B |
4 | 3 | Rikki F |
1 | 7 | 4 | 1645 | 1661 | 16 | 52.3% | Simon B +16.7 | Rikki F -16.7 |
| 283 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Rikki F |
6 | 2 | Nazim C |
4 | 8 | 6 | 1661 | 1673 | 12 | 51.7% | Rikki F +16.5 | Nazim C -16.5 |
| 282 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Mark E |
2 | 8 | Simon B |
6 | 10 | 8 | 1536 | 1645 | 109 | 65.2% | Simon B +11.1 | Mark E -11.1 |
| 281 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Simon B |
2 | 4 | Bill V |
2 | 6 | 4 | 1645 | 1597 | 48 | 56.9% | Bill V +18.2 | Simon B -18.2 |
| 280 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Nazim C |
3 | 3 | Rikki F |
0 | 6 | 3 | 1673 | 1661 | 12 | 51.7% | Rikki F +0.5 | Nazim C -0.5 |
| 279 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Rikki F |
8 | 4 | Simon B |
4 | 12 | 8 | 1661 | 1645 | 16 | 52.3% | Rikki F +15.3 | Simon B -15.3 |
| 278 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | James L |
3 | 2 | Robert S |
1 | 5 | 3 | 1601 | 1627 | 26 | 53.8% | James L +17.2 | Robert S -17.2 |
| 277 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Robert S |
6 | 1 | Mark E |
5 | 7 | 6 | 1627 | 1536 | 91 | 62.8% | Robert S +11.9 | Mark E -11.9 |
| 276 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Bill V |
5 | 1 | James L |
4 | 6 | 5 | 1597 | 1601 | 4 | 50.6% | Bill V +16.2 | James L -16.2 |
| 275 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | James L |
2 | 2 | Nazim C |
0 | 4 | 2 | 1601 | 1673 | 72 | 60.2% | James L +3.3 | Nazim C -3.3 |
| 274 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Rikki F |
6 | 4 | Bill V |
2 | 10 | 6 | 1661 | 1597 | 64 | 59.2% | Rikki F +13.1 | Bill V -13.1 |
| 273 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Robert S |
1 | 5 | Rikki F |
4 | 6 | 5 | 1627 | 1661 | 34 | 54.9% | Rikki F +14.4 | Robert S -14.4 |
| 272 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Simon B |
2 | 1 | James L |
1 | 3 | 2 | 1645 | 1601 | 44 | 56.4% | Simon B +14.0 | James L -14.0 |
| 271 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Nazim C |
6 | 3 | Simon B |
3 | 9 | 6 | 1673 | 1645 | 28 | 54.0% | Nazim C +14.7 | Simon B -14.7 |
| 270 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Mark E |
3 | 8 | Robert S |
5 | 11 | 8 | 1536 | 1627 | 91 | 62.8% | Robert S +11.9 | Mark E -11.9 |
| 269 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Bill V |
3 | 3 | Robert S |
0 | 6 | 3 | 1597 | 1627 | 30 | 54.3% | Bill V +1.4 | Robert S -1.4 |
| 268 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Nazim C |
7 | 1 | Mark E |
6 | 8 | 7 | 1673 | 1536 | 137 | 68.7% | Nazim C +10.0 | Mark E -10.0 |
| 267 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Mark E |
0 | 3 | Rikki F |
3 | 3 | 3 | 1536 | 1661 | 125 | 67.3% | Rikki F +10.5 | Mark E -10.5 |
| 266 | Feb 23 2002 | London II |
League | Robert S |
3 | 2 | Nazim C |
1 | 5 | 3 | 1627 | 1673 | 46 | 56.5% | Robert S +18.1 | Nazim C -18.1 |
| 265 | Feb 9 2002 |  Lund |
League | Jacob K |
1 | 3 | Robert S |
2 | 4 | 3 | 1632 | 1551 | 81 | 61.5% | Robert S +19.7 | Jacob K -19.7 |
| 264 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Robert S |
5 | 4 | Klaus Lo |
1 | 9 | 5 | 1551 | 1600 | 49 | 57.1% | Robert S +18.3 | Klaus Lo -18.3 |
| 263 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Glenn L |
3 | 4 | Klaus Lo |
1 | 7 | 4 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Klaus Lo +16.0 | Glenn L -16.0 |
| 262 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | James L |
3 | 1 | Jacob K |
2 | 4 | 3 | 1615 | 1632 | 17 | 52.5% | James L +16.8 | Jacob K -16.8 |
| 261 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Glenn L |
1 | 1 | James L |
0 | 2 | 1 | 1600 | 1615 | 15 | 52.1% | Glenn L +0.7 | James L -0.7 |
| 260 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Jacob K |
1 | 2 | Glenn L |
1 | 3 | 2 | 1632 | 1600 | 32 | 54.6% | Glenn L +17.5 | Jacob K -17.5 |
| 259 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Klaus Lo |
5 | 4 | James L |
1 | 9 | 5 | 1600 | 1615 | 15 | 52.1% | Klaus Lo +16.7 | James L -16.7 |
| 258 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Robert S |
1 | 0 | Glenn L |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1551 | 1600 | 49 | 57.1% | Robert S +18.3 | Glenn L -18.3 |
| 257 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | James L |
1 | 2 | Robert S |
1 | 3 | 2 | 1615 | 1551 | 64 | 59.1% | Robert S +18.9 | James L -18.9 |
| 256 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Klaus Lo |
6 | 2 | Jacob K |
4 | 8 | 6 | 1600 | 1632 | 32 | 54.6% | Klaus Lo +17.5 | Jacob K -17.5 |
| 255 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Jacob K |
2 | 3 | Robert S |
1 | 5 | 3 | 1632 | 1551 | 81 | 61.5% | Robert S +19.7 | Jacob K -19.7 |
| 254 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Robert S |
0 | 7 | Klaus Lo |
7 | 7 | 7 | 1551 | 1600 | 49 | 57.1% | Klaus Lo +13.7 | Robert S -13.7 |
| 253 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Glenn L |
3 | 3 | Klaus Lo |
0 | 6 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Glenn L +0.0 | Klaus Lo -0.0 |
| 252 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | James L |
6 | 1 | Jacob K |
5 | 7 | 6 | 1615 | 1632 | 17 | 52.5% | James L +16.8 | Jacob K -16.8 |
| 251 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Glenn L |
2 | 3 | James L |
1 | 5 | 3 | 1600 | 1615 | 15 | 52.1% | James L +15.3 | Glenn L -15.3 |
| 250 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Jacob K |
1 | 3 | Glenn L |
2 | 4 | 3 | 1632 | 1600 | 32 | 54.6% | Glenn L +17.5 | Jacob K -17.5 |
| 249 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Klaus Lo |
6 | 3 | James L |
3 | 9 | 6 | 1600 | 1615 | 15 | 52.1% | Klaus Lo +16.7 | James L -16.7 |
| 248 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Robert S |
1 | 4 | Glenn L |
3 | 5 | 4 | 1551 | 1600 | 49 | 57.1% | Glenn L +13.7 | Robert S -13.7 |
| 247 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | James L |
1 | 0 | Robert S |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1615 | 1551 | 64 | 59.1% | James L +13.1 | Robert S -13.1 |
| 246 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Klaus Lo |
4 | 0 | Jacob K |
4 | 4 | 4 | 1600 | 1632 | 32 | 54.6% | Klaus Lo +17.5 | Jacob K -17.5 |
| 245 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Klaus Lo |
1 | 2 | Glenn L |
1 | 3 | 2 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Glenn L +16.0 | Klaus Lo -16.0 |
| 244 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Jacob K |
2 | 4 | James L |
2 | 6 | 4 | 1632 | 1615 | 17 | 52.5% | James L +16.8 | Jacob K -16.8 |
| 243 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Robert S |
4 | 0 | James L |
4 | 4 | 4 | 1551 | 1615 | 64 | 59.1% | Robert S +18.9 | James L -18.9 |
| 242 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Glenn L |
7 | 3 | Robert S |
4 | 10 | 7 | 1600 | 1551 | 49 | 57.1% | Glenn L +13.7 | Robert S -13.7 |
| 241 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Jacob K |
1 | 3 | Klaus Lo |
2 | 4 | 3 | 1632 | 1600 | 32 | 54.6% | Klaus Lo +17.5 | Jacob K -17.5 |
| 240 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Klaus Lo |
8 | 3 | Robert S |
5 | 11 | 8 | 1600 | 1551 | 49 | 57.1% | Klaus Lo +13.7 | Robert S -13.7 |
| 239 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Robert S |
4 | 1 | Jacob K |
3 | 5 | 4 | 1551 | 1632 | 81 | 61.5% | Robert S +19.7 | Jacob K -19.7 |
| 238 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | James L |
4 | 4 | Klaus Lo |
0 | 8 | 4 | 1615 | 1600 | 15 | 52.1% | Klaus Lo +0.7 | James L -0.7 |
| 237 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Glenn L |
5 | 2 | Jacob K |
3 | 7 | 5 | 1600 | 1632 | 32 | 54.6% | Glenn L +17.5 | Jacob K -17.5 |
| 236 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | James L |
0 | 2 | Glenn L |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1615 | 1600 | 15 | 52.1% | Glenn L +16.7 | James L -16.7 |
| 235 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Klaus Lo |
7 | 3 | Glenn L |
4 | 10 | 7 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Klaus Lo +16.0 | Glenn L -16.0 |
| 234 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Jacob K |
0 | 2 | James L |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1632 | 1615 | 17 | 52.5% | James L +16.8 | Jacob K -16.8 |
| 233 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Robert S |
7 | 2 | James L |
5 | 9 | 7 | 1551 | 1615 | 64 | 59.1% | Robert S +18.9 | James L -18.9 |
| 232 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Glenn L |
2 | 1 | Robert S |
1 | 3 | 2 | 1600 | 1551 | 49 | 57.1% | Glenn L +13.7 | Robert S -13.7 |
| 231 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Jacob K |
1 | 8 | Klaus Lo |
7 | 9 | 8 | 1632 | 1600 | 32 | 54.6% | Klaus Lo +17.5 | Jacob K -17.5 |
| 230 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Klaus Lo |
6 | 1 | Robert S |
5 | 7 | 6 | 1600 | 1551 | 49 | 57.1% | Klaus Lo +13.7 | Robert S -13.7 |
| 229 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Robert S |
3 | 2 | Jacob K |
1 | 5 | 3 | 1551 | 1632 | 81 | 61.5% | Robert S +19.7 | Jacob K -19.7 |
| 228 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | James L |
4 | 5 | Klaus Lo |
1 | 9 | 5 | 1615 | 1600 | 15 | 52.1% | Klaus Lo +16.7 | James L -16.7 |
| 227 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | Glenn L |
4 | 3 | Jacob K |
1 | 7 | 4 | 1600 | 1632 | 32 | 54.6% | Glenn L +17.5 | Jacob K -17.5 |
| 226 | Feb 9 2002 | Lund |
League | James L |
1 | 0 | Glenn L |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1615 | 1600 | 15 | 52.1% | James L +15.3 | Glenn L -15.3 |
| 225 | Feb 2 2002 |  Rome |
Final | Gianluca T |
6 | 1 | Alessandro Co |
5 | 7 | 6 | 1792 | 1600 | 192 | 75.1% | Gianluca T +8.0 | Alessandro Co -8.0 |
| 224 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
Final | Alessandro Co |
2 | 5 | Gianluca T |
3 | 7 | 5 | 1600 | 1792 | 192 | 75.1% | Gianluca T +8.0 | Alessandro Co -8.0 |
| 223 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Gianluca T |
5 | 1 | Alessandro Co |
4 | 6 | 5 | 1792 | 1600 | 192 | 75.1% | Gianluca T +8.0 | Alessandro Co -8.0 |
| 222 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Alessandro Co |
1 | 3 | Gianluca T |
2 | 4 | 3 | 1600 | 1792 | 192 | 75.1% | Gianluca T +8.0 | Alessandro Co -8.0 |
| 221 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Filippo D |
1 | 1 | Giacomo T |
0 | 2 | 1 | 1584 | 1600 | 16 | 52.3% | Filippo D +0.7 | Giacomo T -0.7 |
| 220 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Giacomo T |
5 | 2 | Filippo D |
3 | 7 | 5 | 1600 | 1584 | 16 | 52.3% | Giacomo T +15.3 | Filippo D -15.3 |
| 219 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Fabio A |
4 | 2 | Franco C |
2 | 6 | 4 | 1520 | 1552 | 32 | 54.6% | Fabio A +17.5 | Franco C -17.5 |
| 218 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Franco C |
2 | 0 | Fabio A |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1552 | 1520 | 32 | 54.6% | Franco C +14.5 | Fabio A -14.5 |
| 217 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Filippo D |
4 | 1 | Fabio A |
3 | 5 | 4 | 1584 | 1520 | 64 | 59.1% | Filippo D +13.1 | Fabio A -13.1 |
| 216 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Fabio A |
1 | 3 | Filippo D |
2 | 4 | 3 | 1520 | 1584 | 64 | 59.1% | Filippo D +13.1 | Fabio A -13.1 |
| 215 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Giacomo T |
1 | 4 | Alessandro Co |
3 | 5 | 4 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Alessandro Co +16.0 | Giacomo T -16.0 |
| 214 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Alessandro Co |
4 | 2 | Giacomo T |
2 | 6 | 4 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Alessandro Co +16.0 | Giacomo T -16.0 |
| 213 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Franco C |
0 | 4 | Gianluca T |
4 | 4 | 4 | 1552 | 1792 | 240 | 79.9% | Gianluca T +6.4 | Franco C -6.4 |
| 212 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Gianluca T |
7 | 2 | Franco C |
5 | 9 | 7 | 1792 | 1552 | 240 | 79.9% | Gianluca T +6.4 | Franco C -6.4 |
| 211 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Fabio A |
0 | 2 | Alessandro Co |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1520 | 1600 | 80 | 61.3% | Alessandro Co +12.4 | Fabio A -12.4 |
| 210 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Alessandro Co |
5 | 1 | Fabio A |
4 | 6 | 5 | 1600 | 1520 | 80 | 61.3% | Alessandro Co +12.4 | Fabio A -12.4 |
| 209 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Gianluca T |
6 | 1 | Giacomo T |
5 | 7 | 6 | 1792 | 1600 | 192 | 75.1% | Gianluca T +8.0 | Giacomo T -8.0 |
| 208 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Giacomo T |
2 | 4 | Gianluca T |
2 | 6 | 4 | 1600 | 1792 | 192 | 75.1% | Gianluca T +8.0 | Giacomo T -8.0 |
| 207 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Filippo D |
0 | 3 | Franco C |
3 | 3 | 3 | 1584 | 1552 | 32 | 54.6% | Franco C +17.5 | Filippo D -17.5 |
| 206 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Franco C |
11 | 2 | Filippo D |
9 | 13 | 11 | 1552 | 1584 | 32 | 54.6% | Franco C +17.5 | Filippo D -17.5 |
| 205 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Gianluca T |
5 | 0 | Fabio A |
5 | 5 | 5 | 1792 | 1520 | 272 | 82.7% | Gianluca T +5.5 | Fabio A -5.5 |
| 204 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Fabio A |
1 | 8 | Gianluca T |
7 | 9 | 8 | 1520 | 1792 | 272 | 82.7% | Gianluca T +5.5 | Fabio A -5.5 |
| 203 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Alessandro Co |
1 | 5 | Filippo D |
4 | 6 | 5 | 1600 | 1584 | 16 | 52.3% | Filippo D +16.7 | Alessandro Co -16.7 |
| 202 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Filippo D |
3 | 3 | Alessandro Co |
0 | 6 | 3 | 1584 | 1600 | 16 | 52.3% | Filippo D +0.7 | Alessandro Co -0.7 |
| 201 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Franco C |
3 | 3 | Giacomo T |
0 | 6 | 3 | 1552 | 1600 | 48 | 56.9% | Franco C +2.2 | Giacomo T -2.2 |
| 200 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Giacomo T |
6 | 0 | Franco C |
6 | 6 | 6 | 1600 | 1552 | 48 | 56.9% | Giacomo T +13.8 | Franco C -13.8 |
| 199 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Filippo D |
0 | 6 | Gianluca T |
6 | 6 | 6 | 1584 | 1792 | 208 | 76.8% | Gianluca T +7.4 | Filippo D -7.4 |
| 198 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Gianluca T |
2 | 1 | Filippo D |
1 | 3 | 2 | 1792 | 1584 | 208 | 76.8% | Gianluca T +7.4 | Filippo D -7.4 |
| 197 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Fabio A |
1 | 3 | Giacomo T |
2 | 4 | 3 | 1520 | 1600 | 80 | 61.3% | Giacomo T +12.4 | Fabio A -12.4 |
| 196 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Giacomo T |
2 | 0 | Fabio A |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1600 | 1520 | 80 | 61.3% | Giacomo T +12.4 | Fabio A -12.4 |
| 195 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Alessandro Co |
2 | 2 | Franco C |
0 | 4 | 2 | 1600 | 1552 | 48 | 56.9% | Franco C +2.2 | Alessandro Co -2.2 |
| 194 | Feb 2 2002 | Rome |
League | Franco C |
2 | 5 | Alessandro Co |
3 | 7 | 5 | 1552 | 1600 | 48 | 56.9% | Alessandro Co +13.8 | Franco C -13.8 |
| 193 | Jan 7 2002 | London I |
League | Nazim C |
4 | 4 | Simon B |
0 | 8 | 4 | 1680 | 1600 | 80 | 61.3% | Simon B +3.6 | Nazim C -3.6 |
| 192 | Jan 7 2002 | London I |
League | Simon B |
5 | 3 | James L |
2 | 8 | 5 | 1600 | 1632 | 32 | 54.6% | Simon B +17.5 | James L -17.5 |
| 191 | Jan 7 2002 | London I |
League | Robert S |
2 | 3 | James L |
1 | 5 | 3 | 1632 | 1632 | 0 | 50.0% | James L +16.0 | Robert S -16.0 |
| 190 | Jan 7 2002 | London I |
League | Rikki F |
7 | 1 | Nazim C |
6 | 8 | 7 | 1600 | 1680 | 80 | 61.3% | Rikki F +19.6 | Nazim C -19.6 |
| 189 | Jan 7 2002 | London I |
League | Robert S |
0 | 6 | Rikki F |
6 | 6 | 6 | 1632 | 1600 | 32 | 54.6% | Rikki F +17.5 | Robert S -17.5 |
| 188 | Jan 7 2002 | London I |
League | Nazim C |
4 | 2 | Robert S |
2 | 6 | 4 | 1680 | 1632 | 48 | 56.9% | Nazim C +13.8 | Robert S -13.8 |
| 187 | Jan 7 2002 | London I |
League | James L |
3 | 4 | Rikki F |
1 | 7 | 4 | 1632 | 1600 | 32 | 54.6% | Rikki F +17.5 | James L -17.5 |
| 186 | Jan 7 2002 | London I |
League | Simon B |
2 | 0 | Robert S |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1600 | 1632 | 32 | 54.6% | Simon B +17.5 | Robert S -17.5 |
| 185 | Jan 7 2002 | London I |
League | Rikki F |
2 | 3 | Simon B |
1 | 5 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Simon B +16.0 | Rikki F -16.0 |
| 184 | Jan 7 2002 | London I |
League | James L |
2 | 1 | Nazim C |
1 | 3 | 2 | 1632 | 1680 | 48 | 56.9% | James L +18.2 | Nazim C -18.2 |
| 183 | Jan 7 2002 | London I |
League | James L |
1 | 1 | Robert S |
0 | 2 | 1 | 1632 | 1632 | 0 | 50.0% | James L +0.0 | Robert S -0.0 |
| 182 | Jan 7 2002 | London I |
League | Nazim C |
4 | 3 | Rikki F |
1 | 7 | 4 | 1680 | 1600 | 80 | 61.3% | Nazim C +12.4 | Rikki F -12.4 |
| 181 | Jan 7 2002 | London I |
League | Simon B |
2 | 2 | Rikki F |
0 | 4 | 2 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Simon B +0.0 | Rikki F -0.0 |
| 180 | Jan 7 2002 | London I |
League | Robert S |
3 | 1 | Simon B |
2 | 4 | 3 | 1632 | 1600 | 32 | 54.6% | Robert S +14.5 | Simon B -14.5 |
| 179 | Jan 7 2002 | London I |
League | Nazim C |
3 | 4 | James L |
1 | 7 | 4 | 1680 | 1632 | 48 | 56.9% | James L +18.2 | Nazim C -18.2 |
| 178 | Jan 7 2002 | London I |
League | James L |
3 | 4 | Simon B |
1 | 7 | 4 | 1632 | 1600 | 32 | 54.6% | Simon B +17.5 | James L -17.5 |
| 177 | Jan 7 2002 | London I |
League | Simon B |
3 | 4 | Nazim C |
1 | 7 | 4 | 1600 | 1680 | 80 | 61.3% | Nazim C +12.4 | Simon B -12.4 |
| 176 | Jan 7 2002 | London I |
League | Rikki F |
6 | 0 | James L |
6 | 6 | 6 | 1600 | 1632 | 32 | 54.6% | Rikki F +17.5 | James L -17.5 |
| 175 | Jan 7 2002 | London I |
League | Robert S |
1 | 3 | Nazim C |
2 | 4 | 3 | 1632 | 1680 | 48 | 56.9% | Nazim C +13.8 | Robert S -13.8 |
| 174 | Jan 7 2002 | London I |
League | Rikki F |
4 | 1 | Robert S |
3 | 5 | 4 | 1600 | 1632 | 32 | 54.6% | Rikki F +17.5 | Robert S -17.5 |
| 173 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Bill V |
6 | 2 | Apostolos T |
4 | 8 | 6 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Bill V +16.0 | Apostolos T -16.0 |
| 172 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Apostolos T |
1 | 2 | Bill V |
1 | 3 | 2 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Bill V +16.0 | Apostolos T -16.0 |
| 171 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Bill V |
5 | 0 | Takis |
5 | 5 | 5 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Bill V +16.0 | Takis -16.0 |
| 170 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Apostolos T |
4 | 0 | Takis |
4 | 4 | 4 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Apostolos T +16.0 | Takis -16.0 |
| 169 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Takis |
3 | 4 | Bill V |
1 | 7 | 4 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Bill V +16.0 | Takis -16.0 |
| 168 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Takis |
2 | 6 | Apostolos T |
4 | 8 | 6 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Apostolos T +16.0 | Takis -16.0 |
| 167 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Takis |
1 | 5 | George K |
4 | 6 | 5 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | George K +16.0 | Takis -16.0 |
| 166 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Apostolos T |
3 | 3 | George K |
0 | 6 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Apostolos T +0.0 | George K -0.0 |
| 165 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Bill V |
2 | 3 | George K |
1 | 5 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | George K +16.0 | Bill V -16.0 |
| 164 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | George K |
4 | 0 | Takis |
4 | 4 | 4 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | George K +16.0 | Takis -16.0 |
| 163 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | George K |
3 | 3 | Apostolos T |
0 | 6 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | George K +0.0 | Apostolos T -0.0 |
| 162 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | George K |
3 | 2 | Bill V |
1 | 5 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | George K +16.0 | Bill V -16.0 |
| 161 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Bill V |
3 | 4 | Vasilis K |
1 | 7 | 4 | 1600 | 1552 | 48 | 56.9% | Vasilis K +18.2 | Bill V -18.2 |
| 160 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Vasilis K |
2 | 2 | Bill V |
0 | 4 | 2 | 1552 | 1600 | 48 | 56.9% | Vasilis K +2.2 | Bill V -2.2 |
| 159 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Apostolos T |
4 | 5 | Vasilis K |
1 | 9 | 5 | 1600 | 1552 | 48 | 56.9% | Vasilis K +18.2 | Apostolos T -18.2 |
| 158 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Vasilis K |
1 | 1 | Apostolos T |
0 | 2 | 1 | 1552 | 1600 | 48 | 56.9% | Vasilis K +2.2 | Apostolos T -2.2 |
| 157 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Vasilis K |
3 | 3 | George K |
0 | 6 | 3 | 1552 | 1600 | 48 | 56.9% | Vasilis K +2.2 | George K -2.2 |
| 156 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | George K |
2 | 1 | Vasilis K |
1 | 3 | 2 | 1600 | 1552 | 48 | 56.9% | George K +13.8 | Vasilis K -13.8 |
| 155 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Takis |
2 | 1 | Vasilis K |
1 | 3 | 2 | 1600 | 1552 | 48 | 56.9% | Takis +13.8 | Vasilis K -13.8 |
| 154 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Vasilis K |
6 | 0 | Takis |
6 | 6 | 6 | 1552 | 1600 | 48 | 56.9% | Vasilis K +18.2 | Takis -18.2 |
| 153 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Bill V |
5 | 6 | Alkis P |
1 | 11 | 6 | 1600 | 1808 | 208 | 76.8% | Alkis P +7.4 | Bill V -7.4 |
| 152 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Alkis P |
5 | 1 | Bill V |
4 | 6 | 5 | 1808 | 1600 | 208 | 76.8% | Alkis P +7.4 | Bill V -7.4 |
| 151 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Apostolos T |
0 | 4 | Alkis P |
4 | 4 | 4 | 1600 | 1808 | 208 | 76.8% | Alkis P +7.4 | Apostolos T -7.4 |
| 150 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Alkis P |
4 | 2 | Apostolos T |
2 | 6 | 4 | 1808 | 1600 | 208 | 76.8% | Alkis P +7.4 | Apostolos T -7.4 |
| 149 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Vasilis K |
7 | 4 | Alkis P |
3 | 11 | 7 | 1552 | 1808 | 256 | 81.4% | Vasilis K +26.0 | Alkis P -26.0 |
| 148 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Alkis P |
3 | 3 | Vasilis K |
0 | 6 | 3 | 1808 | 1552 | 256 | 81.4% | Vasilis K +10.0 | Alkis P -10.0 |
| 147 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | George K |
4 | 3 | Alkis P |
1 | 7 | 4 | 1600 | 1808 | 208 | 76.8% | George K +24.6 | Alkis P -24.6 |
| 146 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Alkis P |
3 | 0 | George K |
3 | 3 | 3 | 1808 | 1600 | 208 | 76.8% | Alkis P +7.4 | George K -7.4 |
| 145 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Takis |
2 | 7 | Alkis P |
5 | 9 | 7 | 1600 | 1808 | 208 | 76.8% | Alkis P +7.4 | Takis -7.4 |
| 144 | Dec 22 2001 | Athens I |
League | Alkis P |
5 | 0 | Takis |
5 | 5 | 5 | 1808 | 1600 | 208 | 76.8% | Alkis P +7.4 | Takis -7.4 |
| 143 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Final |  Mark P |
3 | 6 | Alkis P |
3 | 9 | 6 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Alkis P +16.0 | Mark P -16.0 |
| 142 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
3rd Place Final | Gianluca T |
5 | 1 | Riemer P |
4 | 6 | 5 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Gianluca T +16.0 | Riemer P -16.0 |
| 141 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Semi Finals | Gianluca T |
4 | 3 | Mark P |
1 | 7 | 4 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Gianluca T +16.0 | Mark P -16.0 |
| 140 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Semi Finals | Mark P |
6 | 3 | Gianluca T |
3 | 9 | 6 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Mark P +16.0 | Gianluca T -16.0 |
| 139 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Semi Finals | Alkis P |
4 | 1 | Riemer P |
3 | 5 | 4 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Alkis P +16.0 | Riemer P -16.0 |
| 138 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Semi Finals | Riemer P |
1 | 5 | Alkis P |
4 | 6 | 5 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Alkis P +16.0 | Riemer P -16.0 |
| 137 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Quarter Finals | Gianluca T |
5 | 1 | Klaus Le |
4 | 6 | 5 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Gianluca T +16.0 | Klaus Le -16.0 |
| 136 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Quarter Finals | Klaus Le |
1 | 3 | Gianluca T |
2 | 4 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Gianluca T +16.0 | Klaus Le -16.0 |
| 135 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Quarter Finals | Mark P |
7 | 4 | Nazim C |
3 | 11 | 7 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Mark P +16.0 | Nazim C -16.0 |
| 134 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Quarter Finals | Nazim C |
4 | 2 | Mark P |
2 | 6 | 4 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Nazim C +16.0 | Mark P -16.0 |
| 133 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Quarter Finals | Alkis P |
1 | 1 | James B |
0 | 2 | 1 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Alkis P +0.0 | James B -0.0 |
| 132 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Quarter Finals | James B |
1 | 3 | Alkis P |
2 | 4 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Alkis P +16.0 | James B -16.0 |
| 131 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Quarter Finals | Steve C |
0 | 1 | Riemer P |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Riemer P +16.0 | Steve C -16.0 |
| 130 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Quarter Finals | Riemer P |
1 | 1 | Steve C |
0 | 2 | 1 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Riemer P +0.0 | Steve C -0.0 |
| 129 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group H | Vasilis K |
2 | 3 | Nazim C |
1 | 5 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Nazim C +16.0 | Vasilis K -16.0 |
| 128 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group H | Gianluca T |
4 | 1 | James L |
3 | 5 | 4 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Gianluca T +16.0 | James L -16.0 |
| 127 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group H | James L |
1 | 0 | Vasilis K |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | James L +16.0 | Vasilis K -16.0 |
| 126 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group H | Nazim C |
1 | 4 | Gianluca T |
3 | 5 | 4 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Gianluca T +16.0 | Nazim C -16.0 |
| 125 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group H | James L |
0 | 1 | Nazim C |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Nazim C +16.0 | James L -16.0 |
| 124 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group H | Gianluca T |
7 | 2 | Vasilis K |
5 | 9 | 7 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Gianluca T +16.0 | Vasilis K -16.0 |
| 123 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group G | Klaus Le |
3 | 2 | Gunther W |
1 | 5 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Klaus Le +16.0 | Gunther W -16.0 |
| 122 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group G | Mark P |
3 | 2 | Martin B |
1 | 5 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Mark P +16.0 | Martin B -16.0 |
| 121 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group G | Martin B |
2 | 2 | Klaus Le |
0 | 4 | 2 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Martin B +0.0 | Klaus Le -0.0 |
| 120 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group G | Gunther W |
0 | 7 | Mark P |
7 | 7 | 7 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Mark P +16.0 | Gunther W -16.0 |
| 119 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group G | Martin B |
0 | 1 | Gunther W |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Gunther W +16.0 | Martin B -16.0 |
| 118 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group G | Mark P |
5 | 1 | Klaus Le |
4 | 6 | 5 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Mark P +16.0 | Klaus Le -16.0 |
| 117 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group F | Riemer P |
3 | 2 | Kees V |
1 | 5 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Riemer P +16.0 | Kees V -16.0 |
| 116 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group F | Alkis P |
5 | 0 | Anthony K |
5 | 5 | 5 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Alkis P +16.0 | Anthony K -16.0 |
| 115 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group F | Anthony K |
0 | 4 | Riemer P |
4 | 4 | 4 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Riemer P +16.0 | Anthony K -16.0 |
| 114 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group F | Kees V |
3 | 4 | Alkis P |
1 | 7 | 4 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Alkis P +16.0 | Kees V -16.0 |
| 113 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group F | Anthony K |
0 | 3 | Kees V |
3 | 3 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Kees V +16.0 | Anthony K -16.0 |
| 112 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group F | Alkis P |
7 | 0 | Riemer P |
7 | 7 | 7 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Alkis P +16.0 | Riemer P -16.0 |
| 111 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group E | Jacob K |
2 | 2 | James B |
0 | 4 | 2 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Jacob K +0.0 | James B -0.0 |
| 110 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group E | Steve C |
3 | 2 | Robert S |
1 | 5 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Steve C +16.0 | Robert S -16.0 |
| 109 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group E | Robert S |
4 | 5 | Jacob K |
1 | 9 | 5 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Jacob K +16.0 | Robert S -16.0 |
| 108 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group E | James B |
3 | 0 | Steve C |
3 | 3 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | James B +16.0 | Steve C -16.0 |
| 107 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group E | Robert S |
1 | 0 | James B |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Robert S +16.0 | James B -16.0 |
| 106 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 2 - Group E | Steve C |
2 | 1 | Jacob K |
1 | 3 | 2 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Steve C +16.0 | Jacob K -16.0 |
| 105 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Kees V |
3 | 0 | Andy M |
3 | 3 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Kees V +16.0 | Andy M -16.0 |
| 104 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Klaus Le |
3 | 2 | Robert S |
1 | 5 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Klaus Le +16.0 | Robert S -16.0 |
| 103 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Gianluca T |
6 | 0 | Danny D |
6 | 6 | 6 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Gianluca T +16.0 | Danny D -16.0 |
| 102 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Jan T |
2 | 3 | Michael Q |
1 | 5 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Michael Q +16.0 | Jan T -16.0 |
| 101 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Klaus Le |
3 | 0 | Danny D |
3 | 3 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Klaus Le +16.0 | Danny D -16.0 |
| 100 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Andy M |
1 | 5 | Jan T |
4 | 6 | 5 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Jan T +16.0 | Andy M -16.0 |
| 99 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Robert S |
1 | 6 | Gianluca T |
5 | 7 | 6 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Gianluca T +16.0 | Robert S -16.0 |
| 98 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Kees V |
5 | 0 | Michael Q |
5 | 5 | 5 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Kees V +16.0 | Michael Q -16.0 |
| 97 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Danny D |
2 | 7 | Robert S |
5 | 9 | 7 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Robert S +16.0 | Danny D -16.0 |
| 96 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Jan T |
0 | 5 | Kees V |
5 | 5 | 5 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Kees V +16.0 | Jan T -16.0 |
| 95 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Gianluca T |
6 | 0 | Klaus Le |
6 | 6 | 6 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Gianluca T +16.0 | Klaus Le -16.0 |
| 94 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Michael Q |
3 | 1 | Andy M |
2 | 4 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Michael Q +16.0 | Andy M -16.0 |
| 93 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Danny D |
3 | 1 | Andy M |
2 | 4 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Danny D +16.0 | Andy M -16.0 |
| 92 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Robert S |
4 | 2 | Michael Q |
2 | 6 | 4 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Robert S +16.0 | Michael Q -16.0 |
| 91 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Klaus Le |
3 | 1 | Jan T |
2 | 4 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Klaus Le +16.0 | Jan T -16.0 |
| 90 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Gianluca T |
3 | 3 | Kees V |
0 | 6 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Gianluca T +0.0 | Kees V -0.0 |
| 89 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Kees V |
4 | 0 | Klaus Le |
4 | 4 | 4 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Kees V +16.0 | Klaus Le -16.0 |
| 88 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Jan T |
0 | 5 | Gianluca T |
5 | 5 | 5 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Gianluca T +16.0 | Jan T -16.0 |
| 87 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Andy M |
1 | 4 | Robert S |
3 | 5 | 4 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Robert S +16.0 | Andy M -16.0 |
| 86 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Michael Q |
0 | 2 | Danny D |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Danny D +16.0 | Michael Q -16.0 |
| 85 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Danny D |
2 | 2 | Kees V |
0 | 4 | 2 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Danny D +0.0 | Kees V -0.0 |
| 84 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Robert S |
1 | 0 | Jan T |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Robert S +16.0 | Jan T -16.0 |
| 83 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Klaus Le |
4 | 1 | Michael Q |
3 | 5 | 4 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Klaus Le +16.0 | Michael Q -16.0 |
| 82 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Gianluca T |
8 | 1 | Andy M |
7 | 9 | 8 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Gianluca T +16.0 | Andy M -16.0 |
| 81 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Kees V |
1 | 2 | Robert S |
1 | 3 | 2 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Robert S +16.0 | Kees V -16.0 |
| 80 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Jan T |
0 | 1 | Danny D |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Danny D +16.0 | Jan T -16.0 |
| 79 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Andy M |
1 | 1 | Klaus Le |
0 | 2 | 1 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Andy M +0.0 | Klaus Le -0.0 |
| 78 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group D | Michael Q |
0 | 6 | Gianluca T |
6 | 6 | 6 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Gianluca T +16.0 | Michael Q -16.0 |
| 77 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group C | Mark P |
3 | 1 | James B |
2 | 4 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Mark P +16.0 | James B -16.0 |
| 76 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group C | Filippo D |
3 | 1 | Mark E |
2 | 4 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Filippo D +16.0 | Mark E -16.0 |
| 75 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group C | Niels T |
0 | 8 | Anthony K |
8 | 8 | 8 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Anthony K +16.0 | Niels T -16.0 |
| 74 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group C | Vasilis K |
4 | 1 | Mark E |
3 | 5 | 4 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Vasilis K +16.0 | Mark E -16.0 |
| 73 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group C | James B |
3 | 0 | Niels T |
3 | 3 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | James B +16.0 | Niels T -16.0 |
| 72 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group C | Mark P |
5 | 0 | Anthony K |
5 | 5 | 5 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Mark P +16.0 | Anthony K -16.0 |
| 71 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group C | Niels T |
0 | 4 | Mark P |
4 | 4 | 4 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Mark P +16.0 | Niels T -16.0 |
| 70 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group C | Filippo D |
0 | 1 | Vasilis K |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Vasilis K +16.0 | Filippo D -16.0 |
| 69 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group C | Anthony K |
4 | 1 | James B |
3 | 5 | 4 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Anthony K +16.0 | James B -16.0 |
| 68 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group C | Mark E |
2 | 4 | James B |
2 | 6 | 4 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | James B +16.0 | Mark E -16.0 |
| 67 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group C | Vasilis K |
6 | 0 | Niels T |
6 | 6 | 6 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Vasilis K +16.0 | Niels T -16.0 |
| 66 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group C | Filippo D |
1 | 3 | Mark P |
2 | 4 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Mark P +16.0 | Filippo D -16.0 |
| 65 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group C | Mark P |
4 | 1 | Vasilis K |
3 | 5 | 4 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Mark P +16.0 | Vasilis K -16.0 |
| 64 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group C | Niels T |
0 | 0 | Filippo D |
0 | 0 | 0 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Niels T +0.0 | Filippo D -0.0 |
| 63 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group C | Anthony K |
3 | 2 | Mark E |
1 | 5 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Anthony K +16.0 | Mark E -16.0 |
| 62 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group C | Mark E |
0 | 8 | Mark P |
8 | 8 | 8 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Mark P +16.0 | Mark E -16.0 |
| 61 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group C | Vasilis K |
0 | 2 | Anthony K |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Anthony K +16.0 | Vasilis K -16.0 |
| 60 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group C | Filippo D |
3 | 1 | James B |
2 | 4 | 3 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Filippo D +16.0 | James B -16.0 |
| 59 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group C | Niels T |
0 | 2 | Mark E |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | Mark E +16.0 | Niels T -16.0 |
| 58 | Nov 3 2001 | World Cup I (Dartford) |
Round 1 - Group C | James B |
2 | 0 | Vasilis K |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1600 | 1600 | 0 | 50.0% | James B +16.0 | Vasilis K -16.0 |