| ID | Date | Tournament | Phase | Player A | A | B | Player B | GD | Sum | TS | Rating A | Rating B | Elo Diff | Fav ES | Adjustment | Adjustment lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1001 | Jul 2 2002 | League | 1 | 4 | Mark P |
3 | 5 | 4 | 1447 | 1906 | 459 | 93.4% | Mark P +2.1 | Sjoerd K -2.1 | ||
| 1002 | Jul 2 2002 | League | 3 | 8 | Kees V |
5 | 11 | 8 | 1637 | 1640 | 4 | 50.5% | Kees V +15.8 | Riemer P -15.8 | ||
| 1003 | Jul 2 2002 | League | 4 | 1 | Sjoerd K |
3 | 5 | 4 | 1640 | 1447 | 194 | 75.3% | Kees V +7.9 | Sjoerd K -7.9 | ||
| 1004 | Jul 2 2002 | League | 5 | 2 | Mark P |
3 | 7 | 5 | 1637 | 1906 | 269 | 82.5% | Riemer P +26.4 | Mark P -26.4 | ||
| 1005 | Jul 2 2002 | League | 4 | 3 | Kees V |
1 | 7 | 4 | 1906 | 1640 | 265 | 82.2% | Mark P +5.7 | Kees V -5.7 | ||
| 1006 | Jul 2 2002 | League | 0 | 1 | Riemer P |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1447 | 1637 | 190 | 74.9% | Riemer P +8.0 | Sjoerd K -8.0 | ||
| 1007 | Jul 2 2002 | League | 3 | 7 | Mark P |
4 | 10 | 7 | 1600 | 1906 | 306 | 85.3% | Mark P +4.7 | Luitzen B -4.7 | ||
| 1008 | Jul 2 2002 | League | 3 | 0 | Luitzen B |
3 | 3 | 3 | 1906 | 1600 | 306 | 85.3% | Mark P +4.7 | Luitzen B -4.7 | ||
| 1009 | Jul 2 2002 | League | 1 | 4 | Riemer P |
3 | 5 | 4 | 1600 | 1637 | 37 | 55.3% | Riemer P +14.3 | Luitzen B -14.3 | ||
| 1010 | Jul 2 2002 | League | 3 | 2 | Luitzen B |
1 | 5 | 3 | 1637 | 1600 | 37 | 55.3% | Riemer P +14.3 | Luitzen B -14.3 | ||
| 1011 | Jul 2 2002 | League | 1 | 1 | Sjoerd K |
0 | 2 | 1 | 1600 | 1447 | 153 | 70.7% | Sjoerd K +6.6 | Luitzen B -6.6 | ||
| 1012 | Jul 2 2002 | League | 2 | 0 | Luitzen B |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1447 | 1600 | 153 | 70.7% | Sjoerd K +22.6 | Luitzen B -22.6 | ||
| 1013 | Jul 2 2002 | League | 0 | 2 | Kees V |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1600 | 1640 | 40 | 55.8% | Kees V +14.1 | Luitzen B -14.1 | ||
| 1014 | Jul 2 2002 | League | 6 | 0 | Luitzen B |
6 | 6 | 6 | 1640 | 1600 | 40 | 55.8% | Kees V +14.1 | Luitzen B -14.1 |